Your shopping cart is empty!
Google adds a creator field to video markup and clarifies counters

- Google's video structured data documentation now covers the creator property, with author documented alongside it.
- For interactionStatistic in VideoObject, Google spelled out which interaction types it supports.
- This is a documentation edit: at the time of publication Google promised neither new snippets nor ranking changes.
Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable noticed that Google had updated its video structured data documentation.
The page now describes the creator and author properties for VideoObject explicitly, and lists the supported interaction types for interactionStatistic. Google words it plainly: the update documents support for creator and author and clarifies the interaction types.
Two new fields and a clarified list of interactions
| Field | Before | Now |
|---|---|---|
| creator | not mentioned in the requirements | support documented |
| author | not mentioned in the requirements | support documented |
| interactionStatistic | interaction types described in general terms | supported types listed |
There is a nuance here that is easy to miss. Google writes about "documenting support", which is not the same as "we have now started reading this".
It looks as though the company simply wrote into the docs what it already knew how to process. You can check that yourself: the current page and the archived copy from 21 September sit side by side, and the difference is visible by eye.
In Schema.org, creator describes the person or organisation that made the video, while interactionStatistic covers interactions: views, likes, comments. For sites where videos sit on the pages themselves these are convenient fields: the author and the counters go into the same JSON-LD you already have.
Who benefits from the clarification about creators and counters
It matters most where video is a standalone asset: publishers, educational projects, online shops with product reviews, experts running a video blog on their own site. There the question of who the author is also affects trust in the page.
If you already output VideoObject, it is worth walking through the template:
- add creator with the author's name or the studio's name where it is known;
- check interactionStatistic against the list of interaction types in the documentation and drop the ones Google does not support;
- test the page in the rich results test and in Search Console so that no new warnings appear.
A separate note on creators. If a third-party author or studio shoots the video on your site, the creator property lets you separate them from the page's publisher. For Ukrainian publishers and educational projects that often run licensed third-party video, it is simply a tidier way to describe whose video it is.
There was a similar story with FAQ: the rules changed quietly, and then it turned out the markup was either useless or only partly useful. We wrote in the summer about how Google shut down FAQ snippets and what to do with markup already in place. This case is gentler: nothing is being taken away, only clarified.
What not to expect from this update
The note promises no new video snippets and no ranking gains. It is a technical documentation edit, and there is no basis for building traffic expectations on it.
I wouldn't turn it into a separate project. If the video on your site is already described in markup and the pages are indexed, you will most likely notice nothing either before or after. If the markup is missing, it belongs with your other work on the technical state of the site.
What interests me more is whether Search Console will ever grow a separate line for the video's author. Google has promised nothing of the kind, and without a report the field lives blind: we put it in, and what search does with it we cannot see.


